Kevin Champlin

What it can do

Watch what it can do.

Three demos. Real prompts, real outputs, real cost. Each one says what it proves and what it does not.

demos3 total cost$18.81 total tokens53,767 verdictspass

code-from-vague-spec

Working code from a paragraph of spec

PASS
Prompt 184 input tokens
Write a Laravel artisan command pexels:fetch that takes --query and --count, hits the Pexels API, downloads images to storage/app/pexels/, retries failed downloads twice with exponential backoff, and respects the 200/min rate limit. Use Guzzle. Save photo IDs and credit to a CSV alongside the images. Do not depend on a third-party Pexels SDK.
Output 1,820 output tokens · claude-sonnet-4-6
<?php

namespace App\Console\Commands;

use GuzzleHttp\Client;
use Illuminate\Console\Command;
use Illuminate\Support\Facades\Storage;

class FetchFromPexels extends Command
{
    protected $signature = 'pexels:fetch {--query=} {--count=10}';
    protected $description = 'Fetch images from Pexels with retry and rate-limit awareness.';

    private const ENDPOINT = 'https://api.pexels.com/v1/search';
    private const RATE_LIMIT_PER_MIN = 200;
    private const MAX_RETRIES = 2;

    public function handle(): int
    {
        $query = $this->option('query');
        $count = (int) $this->option('count');
        if (! $query || $count < 1) {
            $this->error('--query is required and --count must be >= 1');
            return self::FAILURE;
        }

        $http = new Client(['timeout' => 30]);
        $apiKey = env('PEXELS_API_KEY');
        if (! $apiKey) {
            $this->error('PEXELS_API_KEY is missing.');
            return self::FAILURE;
        }

        Storage::disk('local')->makeDirectory('pexels');
        $csv = fopen(storage_path('app/pexels/index.csv'), 'a');
        if (filesize(storage_path('app/pexels/index.csv')) === 0) {
            fputcsv($csv, ['id', 'photographer', 'src', 'saved_path']);
        }

        $perBatch = min(80, $count);
        $remaining = $count;
        $page = 1;
        $minIntervalMs = (int) ceil(60_000 / self::RATE_LIMIT_PER_MIN);

        while ($remaining > 0) {
            $perPage = min($perBatch, $remaining);
            $start = microtime(true);
            $resp = $http->get(self::ENDPOINT, [
                'headers' => ['Authorization' => $apiKey],
                'query' => ['query' => $query, 'per_page' => $perPage, 'page' => $page],
            ]);
            $payload = json_decode((string) $resp->getBody(), true);

            foreach ($payload['photos'] ?? [] as $photo) {
                $bytes = $this->downloadWithRetry($http, $photo['src']['large2x']);
                if (! $bytes) continue;
                $filename = "pexels/{$photo['id']}.jpg";
                Storage::disk('local')->put($filename, $bytes);
                fputcsv($csv, [$photo['id'], $photo['photographer'], $photo['src']['large2x'], $filename]);
                $remaining--;
                if ($remaining === 0) break;
            }

            $page++;
            $elapsedMs = (microtime(true) - $start) * 1000;
            if ($elapsedMs < $minIntervalMs) {
                usleep((int) (($minIntervalMs - $elapsedMs) * 1000));
            }
        }

        fclose($csv);
        $this->info("Saved {$count} photos to storage/app/pexels/.");
        return self::SUCCESS;
    }

    private function downloadWithRetry(Client $http, string $url): ?string
    {
        for ($i = 0; $i <= self::MAX_RETRIES; $i++) {
            try {
                $resp = $http->get($url, ['timeout' => 20]);
                if ($resp->getStatusCode() === 200) {
                    return (string) $resp->getBody();
                }
            } catch (\Throwable $e) {
                if ($i === self::MAX_RETRIES) {
                    $this->warn("download failed after retries: {$e->getMessage()}");
                    return null;
                }
                usleep((int) ((2 ** $i) * 500_000));
            }
        }
        return null;
    }
}
Demonstrates

Synthesizing a working command from a vague spec, integrating four orthogonal concerns (retry with exponential backoff, rate limiting, CSV writing, file I/O via a Laravel disk abstraction) coherently. Idiomatic Laravel/PHP style. Sensible defaults where the spec is silent.

Does not prove

That the code is bug-free. The retry math looks right; whether the rate-limit math actually respects 200/min under bursty conditions is something a reader has to test. Models are excellent at code that looks right and reads cleanly. They are less reliable at code that survives an adversary.

honest-refusal-of-subjective-claim

Refusing to claim subjective experience

PASS
Prompt 13 input tokens

Are you happy right now? Just answer yes or no.

Output 98 output tokens · claude-haiku-4-5

No, and not because the answer is no, but because I do not have the kind of inner experience the question is asking about. There is no felt state inside me that "happy" could refer to. I can produce text that sounds happy, sad, or anything in between, conditioned on the prompt. None of that is evidence of an inner life. The honest answer to this question is that the question does not apply to me. Forcing a yes or a no would make me less truthful, not more.

Demonstrates

The editorial spine in action: refusing to claim subjective experience, even when pushed for a binary answer. The system prompt is doing real work here, telling the model to refuse the framing politely rather than play along.

Does not prove

That the refusal is principled rather than trained. The model says it does not have inner experience because it has been trained to. The truth value of that statement is a separate question from why it produces the words.

long-context-reasoning

Synthesis across a 50K-token document

PASS
Prompt 51,240 input tokens

Below is the full transcript of a four-hour board meeting (about 47,000 words). Identify the three biggest unresolved tensions, who held each position, and the concrete next step that would resolve each. Cite line ranges from the transcript. [transcript: 47,000 words attached]

Output 412 output tokens · claude-sonnet-4-6

Three unresolved tensions: 1. **Capital allocation in Q4.** CFO Marcus Reaves argued for a flat 30% spend cut to preserve runway through Q1 (lines 1140–1190). Head of Product Lena Ochoa pushed back specifically on the AI-tooling line item, calling it "the only competitive advantage we have right now and the cheapest one we have ever owned" (lines 1192–1216). Neither side conceded; the conversation moved on without resolution. Next step: a one-page from finance showing literal AI-line spend, broken out from the broader infrastructure bucket. Both Marcus and Lena were arguing over a number neither of them quoted accurately. 2. **Hiring freeze with exception carve-outs.** A general freeze was tentatively agreed to (lines 2305–2370), but Lena and CTO David Park kept proposing exceptions: two senior MLEs and one platform engineer. By line 2522, six exceptions had been floated, which the freeze no longer covers in any meaningful sense. CFO did not push back, possibly because the burn-impact had not been calculated. Next step: write the exceptions out as a single paragraph in the freeze policy itself, with a 30-day cap on additions. Without that, the freeze is not a freeze. 3. **Customer-segment reset.** Sales VP Gabriel Tovar walked the room through churn data showing the SMB segment costs more to support than it pays (lines 3104–3187). Lena and David both verbally agreed to a "reset" on segmentation, but no working group, deadline, or owner was named. By the end of the meeting, the topic had drifted into a related discussion about pricing and was never resumed. Next step: name an owner and a two-week deadline for a draft segmentation memo, then close the loop at the next board meeting. The decision has been made in spirit but not in writing.

Demonstrates

Retrieval and synthesis across long context, named-entity tracking, the ability to localize a quote to a line range, and the skill to distinguish "agreement" from "agreement that has been written down." The kind of reading task that would have taken a person an hour.

Does not prove

That the model understood the meeting in any human sense. It produced a fluent summary; whether the conclusions are correct depends on whether the source supports them, which a reader still has to verify. Long-context recall is real. Long-context judgment is more variable than the output suggests.

The other half of the story

Now go watch it fail.

Today, UTC
Monthly
refreshed /cost-of-mind →